AirTag vs. LoJack — Which Technology Is More Advanced, and Can a Jammer Really Help Protect You ?

When it comes to modern tracking systems, Apple AirTags and LoJack GPS trackers stand at opposite ends of the spectrum. Both serve the same goal — locating valuable items — but their working principles, signal technologies, and resistance to interference are very different. This difference explains why some users turn to signal Blockers as a means of protecting their privacy.

1. AirTag: Smart, Precise, and Dependent on the Apple Network

Apple's AirTag is a compact Bluetooth and Ultra-Wideband tracker designed to help users find personal items. It works through Apple's massive Find My Network, which relies on millions of iPhones to anonymously relay the tag's location.

This crowd-assisted design makes AirTags extremely effective in populated areas, offering near-centimeter precision through UWB technology.

However, AirTags have one clear weakness: they depend entirely on nearby Apple devices.

If no iPhones are in range, or if the signal is blocked by walls or interference, the tracker loses its connection.

In such scenarios, Bluetooth or WiFi jammers can temporarily disrupt communication, preventing an AirTag from updating its position in real time.

2. LoJack: Long-Range Power through GPS and Cellular Signals

LoJack, on the other hand, uses a completely different approach. Instead of short-range Bluetooth, it relies on GPS satellites and cellular networks to locate vehicles or other assets.
This allows LoJack systems to function over long distances, even when the tracked item is far from any smartphone network.

Because LoJack transmits data through powerful, wide-area signals, it's much harder to disrupt.
While an AirTag might lose contact due to simple local interference, GPS trackers like LoJack operates independently, maintaining its signal through stronger frequencies and dedicated communication channels.

In short, AirTag focuses on short-range precision; LoJack prioritizes large-scale reliability.

3. Can a Jammer Really Protect You from Tracking ?

Some people use Jammer devices as a personal defense — to prevent unwanted tracking or monitoring.
In principle, jammers can effectively block Bluetooth, WiFi, or UWB signal, which means they can interrupt AirTag communication.
However, jammers have little effect on GPS- or cellular-based systems like LoJack, which operate on different frequencies and power levels.

That's why AirTags are easier to disrupt locally, while LoJack remains resistant even in strong interference environments.
For those seeking privacy, understanding these differences helps choose the right protection method — whether shielding small trackers or limiting wireless exposure.